<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:type xml:lang="ita">Testo</dc:type>
  <dc:type xml:lang="ita">Rapporto</dc:type>
  <dc:title xml:lang="eng">Your feed, my identity: the politics of gendered narratives in the online space</dc:title>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Gendered political discourse</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Social media polarization</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Algorithmic amplification</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Platform governance</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">U.S. presidential election 2024</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Online harassment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Identity politics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject xml:lang="eng">Transdisciplinary research</dc:subject>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:description xml:lang="eng">This report explores how social media, particularly X (formerly Twitter), is used to shape gender-based political discourse, and how this contributes to ideological polarization in the context of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we triangulated data from desk research, a qualitative survey of voters’ experiences, social media scraping of hashtags (#MAGA, #TradWife, #YourBodyMyChoice), and expert interviews from fields including computational social science, social media research, and online extremism. 

Our findings reveal that gender serves as a powerful ideological an¬chor around which political identities form, where social media can act as an accelerant to these processes, albeit not a causal relationship. We identify specific themes around which this relationship is explored, including the employment of ‘traditional roles’, the spectrum of feminism being redefined, the collapse of boundaries be¬tween online and offline spaces, the predominantly emotional na¬ture of gender-based political discourse as well as the mechanisms through which platform architectures can influence polarization. The report concludes with evidence-based intervention pathways addressing platform and algorithm design, human moderation, and community-based digital literacy approaches to mitigate harmful polarization while preserving democratic deliberation.</dc:description>
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">Text</dc:type>
  <dc:type xml:lang="eng">report</dc:type>
  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
  <dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:creator>Andrea Forero Cañizares</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dawit Gebresilassie</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Jenny Jiyeon Kim</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kaela van der Vaart</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Roberta Ramos</dc:creator>
  <dc:type xml:lang="deu">Text</dc:type>
  <dc:type xml:lang="deu">Bericht</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://door.donau-uni.ac.at/o:6056</dc:identifier>
</oai_dc:dc>