<resource xmlns:datacite="http://datacite.org/schema/kernel-4">
<creators>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Andrea Forero Cañizares</creatorName>
<givenName>Andrea Forero</givenName>
<familyName>Cañizares</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Dawit Gebresilassie</creatorName>
<givenName>Dawit</givenName>
<familyName>Gebresilassie</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Jenny Jiyeon Kim</creatorName>
<givenName>Jenny Jiyeon</givenName>
<familyName>Kim</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Kaela van der Vaart</creatorName>
<givenName>Kaela</givenName>
<familyName>van der Vaart</familyName>
</creator>
<creator>
<creatorName nameType="Personal">Roberta Ramos</creatorName>
<givenName>Roberta</givenName>
<familyName>Ramos</familyName>
</creator>
</creators>
<titles>
<title>Your feed, my identity: the politics of gendered narratives in the online space</title>
</titles>
<descriptions>
<description descriptionType="Other">This report explores how social media, particularly X (formerly Twitter), is used to shape gender-based political discourse, and how this contributes to ideological polarization in the context of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election. Using a transdisciplinary approach, we triangulated data from desk research, a qualitative survey of voters’ experiences, social media scraping of hashtags (#MAGA, #TradWife, #YourBodyMyChoice), and expert interviews from fields including computational social science, social media research, and online extremism. 

Our findings reveal that gender serves as a powerful ideological an¬chor around which political identities form, where social media can act as an accelerant to these processes, albeit not a causal relationship. We identify specific themes around which this relationship is explored, including the employment of ‘traditional roles’, the spectrum of feminism being redefined, the collapse of boundaries be¬tween online and offline spaces, the predominantly emotional na¬ture of gender-based political discourse as well as the mechanisms through which platform architectures can influence polarization. The report concludes with evidence-based intervention pathways addressing platform and algorithm design, human moderation, and community-based digital literacy approaches to mitigate harmful polarization while preserving democratic deliberation.</description>
</descriptions>
<resourceType resourceTypeGeneral="Text">PDFDocument</resourceType>
<language>eng</language>
<dates>
<date dateType="Created">2026-02-24T07:34:50.626758Z</date>
</dates>
<subjects>
<subject>Gendered political discourse</subject>
<subject>Social media polarization</subject>
<subject>Algorithmic amplification</subject>
<subject>Platform governance</subject>
<subject>U.S. presidential election 2024</subject>
<subject>Online harassment</subject>
<subject>Identity politics</subject>
<subject>Transdisciplinary research</subject>
</subjects>
<sizes>
<size>13162896 b</size>
</sizes>
<formats>
<format>application/pdf</format>
</formats>
<rightsList>
<rights rightsURI="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/">http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</rights>
</rightsList>
</resource>
